What the RBI has done to check the rupee fall isn’t a wrong
move if it is taken to be a temporary step. Although a lot of criticism has
been poured over the Central Bank the steps have greatly highlighted the need
to do more on the fiscal side rather than the monetary side. The move on the
part of FED and the consequent fall of EM’s currencies was there for all to
see. It rather came as rude shock yet on the whole it has been good to the
extent that relying on easy money has its pitfalls in the future, if not in the
present or immediate future. The economy of the world is slowly trying to grasp
the idea as to how to create more jobs and sustainable businesses and that the
way through the monetary channel has its own limitations.
There is nothing wrong in saying that the rupee correction
is long overdue basically due to lack of fundamentals in the economy. So simply
blaming the RBI for its miscalculations isn’t right. But it did give more room
for thoughts and obviously the stance that monetary channels have to be pruned
with times. We wouldn’t have seen this as a thorough proof without the RBI
venturing into it. Now since the time has come to focus on growth and balancing
of inflation we can do so within our reasonable means so as to bring about
investor’s confidence in our market.
In order to cut the long story short the following
questions and answers would throw some light into the whole balancing act that
the RBI and other commercial banks would need to bring in growth into the
economy.
Question- Where should growth take place as in the case of
India?
Answer – Growth in India should take place in the real
economy especially in infrastructure, energy, power, manufacturing, exports and
services.
Question- But won’t growth affect inflation as a lot of
money poured into banks would shoot up the inflation?
Answer- Yes and No both is the right answer for it is the
way we deal with the money that assumes importance here and not simply putting
money as investment.
Question- How is that to happen?
Answer – When banks give loans they tend to do so over the
counter and this is inflationary and that means any liquidity will create the
existing level of inflation to shoot up.
Question – Then how will the banks give loans?
Answer – The banks will give loans only in packaged forms
with focus on specific purposes only with periodical appraisal of these loans. Weekly
audits or fortnight audits would be better. Under no circumstances should the
money be allowed to float around in non-productive purposes.
Question – But there is a credit crunch and shouldn’t the
RBI do something about it?
Answer – The RBI in its early policy of tightening
liquidity has done the right thing then, but now ought to loosen its fingers.
Question – But wouldn’t that be inflationary?
Answer – True, if it is done in the traditional way with
the banks given the money directly to give away as loan to one and all. However,
if there is regulatory mechanism or some sort of mechanism through which the
banks can specify the ‘live’ projects for the loan to the RBI then the loan
amount is in packed condition. Then there wouldn’t be any surge in the existing
inflation.
Question – Does that mean if any of the packages leak there
will be inflation?
Answer – Yes, even if the banks were to fund several
specific projects costing one lakh crore rupees then there wouldn’t be any
increase in the existing inflation. But even if 1% of that amount goes loose or
over the bank counter in several non-specific loans then inflation will shoot
up through the stratosphere. This is a certainty.
Question – What about the FDI route?
Answer – FDI investments are non-inflationary as they have
specific projects to start off. For example, IKEA may start furniture business
and may also do business in some related items. They will surely not run into
the fish market and start selling large scale sea fish or start a real estate
business overnight. All these FDI projects are disciplinary and hence they tend
to inflate the inflation much less than over the counter business.
Question – Money that goes directly into the hands of
people are inflationary?
Answer – Yes, money that goes over the counter with little
control from the bank side like flashy credit cards, quick loans, easy credit
on gold or landed property and any other means. These are surely necessary, but
the banks should put some restrain on it. Many of this money go for loose
purchase and speculation.
Question – What about CRR cut, Interest rate cuts and
others?
Answer – Unfortunately the CRR cut, CLR cuts, Interest rate
cuts, capital infusion, printing more rupees and such like are all
inflationary. However, these are a must for growth to take place and the only
way is to evolve a technique such that the commercial banks can give a list of
‘live’ projects for loan disbursement to the RBI and this should be in packaged
form with periodical and better still weekly appraisal by the bank on the firm
that has taken it. Under no circumstances should the money get diverted for
something else. If that is so, inflation will shoot up dramatically.
Question – That is for large projects and what about a firm
that requires 10 crores rupees as loan?
Answer – Whether large or small firms the principle for
following the anti inflationary path is the same. Banks should give 10 crores
in loan under a package deal and then start to monitor the money on a weekly or
fortnightly basis. If all banks do the same then there will be no increase in
the existing inflation.
Question – What about real estate loans?
Answer – Real estate loans are usually seen to be porous
and may leak to different projects and are very inflationary. The best way to
tackle the same is to keep specific projects in a loan packaged form and which
the bank should keep rigid track. This is true for those real estate businesses
that have huge capital and even the small ones.
Question – Will the rupee stabilize if the above is
followed?
Answer – When the economy picks up it is obvious that the
Indian long run growth story would again be news. This would mean a lot of flow
of both FII and FDI money into the Indian market and thereby lifting the value
of the rupee.
Question – So by keeping a tight parameter for loans the
economy would pick up?
Answer – Sure, but also the delay in licensing, lack of
structural reforms, over taxation and corruption have to be addressed too. As
anyone knows ‘Live’ projects cannot be given loan until the bottlenecks are
removed. Otherwise, who will bother to invest?
No comments:
Post a Comment